Re: Similes Without Like or As
Posted by:
IanB (---.tnt11.mel1.da.uu.net)
Date: January 16, 2022 06:10AM
Those are interesting questions Hugh has raised.
A simile illuminates or evokes the nature of something by stating its resemblance to something else. The classic format is that something is ‘like’ something else, or shares some quality with something else, i.e. it is ‘as’ [adjective] ‘as’ [whatever]. Examples: ‘Publishing a volume of verse is like dropping a rose petal down the Grand Canyon and waiting for the echo.’ (Don Marquis); ‘You’re as cool as the other side of the pillow’ (Prince Rogers Nelson).
The words ‘like’ and ‘as’ aren’t essential if equivalent words are used. Hugh has identified some phrases synonymous with ‘like’ (‘reminded me of’; ‘in the manner of’; ‘could have been mistaken for’). There must be many others. Some unkind reporter once described the front view of Prince Charles’ ears as ‘bringing to mind’ the FA Cup or a London cab with both doors open. An article in yesterday’s newspaper reported Oliver Stone poring over crits panning his latest film ‘Alexander The Great’ and said he ‘had the mien of’ someone who had just seen his favourite child disemboweled. And there are other, more elaborate comparative formats (e.g. describing a person who besmirched the reputation of the organization he worked for as ‘doing for it what the Boston strangler did for door-to-door salesmen’).
Yet not every statement of resemblance or of shared quality should be classed as a simile, even when ‘like’ is used. For instance the statement ‘The twins are identical’ isn’t a simile. I suggest it’s not a simile to say ‘The ice-cream tasted of vanilla’ or ‘His present wife looks remarkably like his former wife’, or ‘The man I just saw in the street looked like the man in the Wanted poster’. The intention of such statements is purely informational. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary in its brief entry for ‘simile’ defines it as a figure of speech involving the comparison of one thing with another of a different kind ‘as an illustration or ornament’. Sometimes however the line between informational and ornamental is hard to draw, or depends on context. Hugh’s example ‘The ice cream had the taste of an orange’ is perhaps a borderline case.
It seems inconsistent to class statements of dissimilarity as similes, even though they illuminate by contrast. “How unlike, how very unlike the home life of our own dear queen”, as a Victorian matron once said, after seeing Sarah Bernhardt’s sizzling performance in the title role in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra. Another, less obvious example: ‘Makes Ben Hur look like an epic!’ - a line used to promote the film ‘Monty Python and the Holy Grail’. I like Johnny’s suggested name ‘dissimiles’.
Comparatives, i.e. comparisons involving ‘less than’ or ‘more than’ or equivalent formulations (e.g. ‘hotter than a two dollar water pistol’; ‘busier than a one-armed paper hanger’) are by definition statements of difference, so could logically be grouped with the dissimiles, but here again the lines get blurred. In a ‘less than’ comparison (e.g. ‘a cost accountant is someone who has the training but not the charisma to be an auditor’) the subject implicitly shares some of the relevant quality; and in a ‘more than’ comparison (e.g. ‘Faster than the Fourteenth Century!’ – another line used to promote ‘Monty Python and the Holy Grail’) it implicitly has all of it and more. So does that make comparatives similes of a kind? This is just a terminological question. Comparatives are what they are. I’m happy to go on calling them comparatives, while recognizing that, like classic similes, they can be evocative and illuminating.
I feel much the same about superlatives, mentioned by Hugh as a possible variety of simile. They can be evocative and illuminating (e.g. ‘greatest comeback since Lazarus’), and do involve comparison, but I’ll go on just calling them superlatives.
Which leads to the topic of hyperbolic description (e.g. ‘She had the kind of body that would make a bishop kick out a stained glass window’ – Raymond Chandler in ‘The Big Sleep’; ‘a face ugly enough to turn a funeral up an alley’ – an Irish saying; ‘windy enough to blow a cow off a cliff’ – another Irish saying; ‘so sure of himself that he does crossword puzzles with a fountain pen’; and an example of inverted hyperbole, from a cheeky blurb I once saw on a dust-jacket: ‘Brilliant! Original! A Riveting Read! These are just some of the things the critics have yet to say about this book!’). Such a description can be evocative and illuminating, but doesn’t embody the comparison of one element with another which is at the heart of any simile.
A metaphor equates two diverse elements. The effect can be just as evocative and illuminating as a simile, but the fundamental difference is that the metaphor can’t be taken literally. To the extent that it needs to be understood non-literally, you could say that it involves some exaggeration or distortion. The classic variety asserts expressly that one thing IS some different thing (e.g. “Your prime minister is a man of steel”: George W Bush, to the Australian press; or ‘That’s the way the cookie crumbles’). Much more common is the use of descriptor expressions which don’t apply literally but which are treated as applicable in place of some literal descriptor that might have been used. Thus there can be metaphoric verbs (‘He oiled his way around the floor, oozing charm from every pore’ – from ‘My Fair Lady’) or adjectives (see the examples given above by Marian-NYC) or noun expressions (‘cellar dwellers’) or catch phrases (‘we don’t have a dog in that fight’). Many expressions (e.g. ‘underdog’) which originate as metaphors eventually become accepted as having literal meanings in their own right with their metaphoric origins forgotten.
It’s usually not hard to distinguish metaphors from similes, but I can’t decide whether the 1970s saying that ‘Sophia Loren is the thinking man’s Twiggy’ should be classed as a metaphor, a simile, a dissimile, a hyperbolic description, or some other figure of speech. Anyone have any thoughts on that?
Ian
Post Edited (01-16-05 07:48)