Re: WIT
Posted by:
jerrygarner7 (---.lax.untd.com)
Date: June 21, 2022 01:31PM
Witticisms directed at individuals
Wit requires that the listener have some knowledge of the targeted individual; if the listener does not know, or know of, the targeted individual the witticism will lack impact. The witty remark conveys enmity directed at the targeted individual, but falls short of a vicious attack. The quip directs attention to an absence of a trait that it was assumed the targeted individual possessed: intelligence, morality, decency… The quip questions the individual’s possession of one or more of these traits.
Witty remarks must contain an element of truth, the allegation may be unlikely, but it must be possible.
The quip is a poisoned seed planted, anticipating growth. Hopefully, the listener will repeat the quip to his peers, who in turn will repeat the quip, until it reaches the ears of the targeted individual.
It is repeated because it contains slander that makes the listener smile.
Wit, directed at another individual requires patience, the right time, the right place, the right person to deliver the quip too. Witticisms are best delivered when the targeted individual has committed a faux pas, giving creditability to the quip that the targeted individual is lacking.
Humor is inclusive; wit is exclusive- the intent of slander is to define the targeted individual, as ‘Not one of us.’
Wit is normally associated with high brow, urban folk-not true. Rural witticism is rollicking and not for mixed company, but it certainly make its point.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/21/2005 01:32PM by jerrygarner7.