Although we have no way of knowing in advance which road has adventure, excitement and all the other goodies Anna talks about, let that road be R2.
Let the next travelers be:
100th = Robert Frost
101st = Soma
102nd = Anna
103rd = Mark
Robert Frost walks down R2 (as he relates in the poem). Soma arrives and is faced with the situation he mentioned in his previous post, namely, that the two roads are indistinguishable. Without giving it a moment's thought he strolls along R2. Anna arrives, checks the counters, and following her 'less-traveled' philosophy heads off along R1. Anna's choice of R1 is not really her own. Soma does this or that and Anna, rather pathetically, does the opposite, being under the whim of Soma. Even swapping places in the queue with either Soma or Mark would leave Anna with a random choice - hardly what she would wish.
Mark, Anna's disciple, comes along to find both counters on 51. What is he to do? Would Anna approve of him using Soma's "couldn't-care-less" approach? No! he must do something methodical. Mark tosses a coin - R1 if heads - R2 if tails. Heads it is and Mark follows Anna along R1 - the road to mediocrity.
-------------------------------------------------------
Anna might argue that an equal number of travelers on each road is unlikely. I agree! but if Anna is able to sway more and more to her philosophical standpoint then equality is inevitable and the scenario described becomes reality. Its application leads it to its own failure. If a system is to have validity it must handle all contingencies.
When Frost says, Yet knowing how way leads to way means that the chosen road also diverges again and again. If Anna repeatedly chooses the less-traveled branch she will very quickly reach journey's end in a cul-de-sac. Try it, and find it is so! Though Mark endeavors to follow Anna's example his occasional random choice of road will take him further but still to an inevitable dead-end.
-------------------------------------------------------
Though the above is theoretical, many, many years ago I carried out a practical experiment. Whilst cycling my own "Tour de France" I came to a "Y" junction. I cycled along its right branch. A short way along that road was another "Y" junction. I chose the left branch. At each succeeding "Y" I chose the opposite to that which I had previously chosen. Sometimes it was the 'less-traveled' and sometimes the 'more-traveled' but with no loss of adventure or interest in spite of that. Inevitably my journey would reach a dead-end but only after far more twists and turns than either Anna's or Mark's could achieve. Eventually I ran out of road in a fat French farmer's duck pond in a tiny village called Mousy. A few too many glasses of vin rouge later I mounted my bycycle and wobbled an unsteady course back to the original "Y" junction thus solving the Frostian difficulty I doubted if I should ever come back. How did I get back? I simply continued with the right and left course changes on my return journey. So ended an exciting adventure with its mixture of 'less-traveled' and 'more-traveled' course changes - a lesson to live by.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/27/2006 04:04PM by lg.